RE: Encoding for Screencams |
|
11-01-2008, 04:20 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Encoding for Screencams
Posted By: Ingles, Dave
Ok, so it sounds like it's downscaling that is really affecting you e.g. 10= 24x768 -> 800x600 Are you saying that Camtasia handles 1024x768 -> 800x600 ok as well ? (Obvi= ously to fit a 1024x768 frame on a 800x600 display you either have to scale= down or crop to fit.) One thing that can affect text clarity is the clear type for LCD monitors s= etting. Camtasia may disable this by default without you knowing. See Ben's= blog at: http://on10.net/blogs/benwagg/21738/ Another is the CODEC - If I recall correctly Camtasia uses its own special = screen CODEC whereas I presume you are using the one supplied with WME. Also, a lot can depend upon whether Windows is set to the native display re= solution of the monitor in use. Some people will use 1024x768 on a 17" moni= tor which has a native resolution of 1280x1024, just to increase font size = rather than using the large fonts options which can cause problems with cer= tain applications. This results in scaling artefacts between the video card= and the monitor on top of which you are adding scaling artefacts of video = frame size vs display resolution. On a side note, I don' think this is related, but I've noticed some strange= things with streaming video with respect to perceived display quality when= it comes to LCD monitors. Ok, there's the speed of the monitor to consider= , however I've found that certain CODEC's appear to work better on certain = monitors than others whereas others will appear to work about the same on a= ll monitors. Dave From: Mark O'Brien Sent: Fri 31/10/2008 19:26 To: StreamingMedia.com - Newbies Subject: RE: [newbies] Encoding for Screencams Dave, Thanks for the quick reply. I am using the standalone WMV player. I don't= believe it is a scaling issue, it appears to be related to differences bet= ween the screen resolution when recording and the resolution on playback. = I just made a small sample recording here is what happened. I set my screen resolution to 1024x768, then recorded a few seconds of scre= en capture. I made sure "fit on resize" was off and video size was 100%. = I then set my screen resolution to different values and played the video ba= ck. At 1024x768 (recorded resolution) it looked ok. At 1680x1050 (my display's native resolution) it looked great (better than = 1024x768) At 800x600, it looked horrible. You could not read any of the text. I sent it to some others in my office, and they got the same playback resul= ts. It looked good at some screen resolutions and bad at others. I am try= ing to determine how to get consistently good results with the standalone W= MV player without knowing what the playback screen resolution is. We also = noticed that going to full screen mode sometimes made it look better. I downloaded a demo version of the Camtasia flash based screen recorder (ht= tp://www.techsmith.com/camtasia.asp) and that seemed to work fine every tim= e. One of the differences is that they use an embedded player inside a web= page. Perhaps using an embedded WMV player would also work consistently, = but my preference is the standalone player. I prefer WMV because that is what I know best (and it is free). However, I= may need to switch to Camtasia if I cannot get this figured out. Thanks for your suggestions. Mark From: Ingles, Dave [mailto: Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:55 AM To: StreamingMedia.com - Newbies Subject: RE: [newbies] Encoding for Screencams I'm not quite sure that I fully understand what you are trying to say here,= however any attempt to rescale the video from its actual frame size will g= enerally result in loss of perceptual quality, especially if there is fine = detail involved, as is usually the case with screen capture. If you are playing the video back in the standalone media player, then you = may need to turn off the 'fit video to player on resize' type option in the= player and select the video size to 100% so as it displays at its original= size. If you are playing it in an embedded player you could specify the si= ze of the embedded player to match the video size (plus the controls) so as= it maintains the 1024x768 resolution. The same issue applies with sync'd slide content, as the quality of the sli= des will vary depending on if they are being scaled up or down from that of= their actual size. Dave From: Mark O'Brien [mailto:] Sent: 31 October 2008 15:15 To: StreamingMedia.com - Newbies Subject: [newbies] Encoding for Screencams Jan Ozzer's recent article in streaming media magazine did an excellent job= of addressing screen capture encoding. However, I did not see the problem= that I consistently run into addressed. I typically use WMV for screen captures, and they work great as long as the= playback machine has the same screen resolution. However, if I change my = screen resolution, or go to another machine with a different screen resolut= ion, the video looks horrible. Is there any way around this problem? Right now I try to pick a "standard"= resolution like 1024 x 768 before recording, but there is no way to know w= hat resolution the end user is actually using. Also, many people have wide= screens now, which make screen captures look even worse. I am looking for a way to make screen capture video look good at any playba= ck screen resolution. The ideal solution would be playback video that main= tains consistent quality, with only the viewing window getting bigger or sm= aller depending on the viewer's screen settings. Is there a way to do that= ? Thanks, Mark v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} Ok, so it sounds= like it's downscaling that is really affecting you e.g. 1024x768 -> 800= x600 Are you saying that Camtasia han= dles 1024x768 -> 800x600 ok as well ?= (Obviously to fit a 1024x768 frame on a 800x600 display you either have to= scale down or crop to fit.) One thing that can affect text c= larity is the clear type for LCD monitors setting. Camtasia may disable thi= s by default without you knowing. See Ben's blog at: http://on10.net/blogs/benwagg/21738/ Another is the CODEC - If I reca= ll correctly Camtasia uses its own special screen CODEC whereas I pres= ume you are using the one supplied with WME. Also, a lot can depend upon whet= her Windows is set to the native display resolution of the monitor in use. = Some people will use 1024x768 on a 17" monitor which has a native resolutio= n of 1280x1024, just to increase font size rather than using the large= fonts options which can cause problems with certain applications. This res= ults in scaling artefacts between the video card and the monitor on top of = which you are adding scaling artefacts of video frame size vs display resol= ution. On a side note, I don' think thi= s is related, but I've noticed some strange things with streaming video&nbs= p;with respect to perceived display quality when it comes to LCD monitors. = Ok, there's the speed of the monitor to consider, however I've found t= hat certain CODEC's appear to work better on certain monitors than oth= ers whereas others will appear to work about the same on all moni= tors. Dave From: Mark O'BrienSent: Fri = 31/10/2008 19:26To: StreamingMedia.com - NewbiesSubject: RE: [newbies] Encoding for Screencams Dave,= Thanks for the quick re= ply. I am using the standalone WMV player. I don’t believ= e it is a scaling issue, it appears to be related to differences between th= e screen resolution when recording and the resolution on playback. I just made a small sam= ple recording here is what happened. I set my screen resolut= ion to 1024x768, then recorded a few seconds of screen capture. I mad= e sure “fit on resize” was off and video size was 100%. I= then set my screen resolution to different values and played the video bac= k. At 1024x768 (recorded r= esolution) it looked ok. At 1680x1050 (my displa= y’s native resolution) it looked great (better than 1024x768) At 800x600, it looked h= orrible. You could not read any of the text. I sent it to some other= s in my office, and they got the same playback results. It looked goo= d at some screen resolutions and bad at others. I am trying to determ= ine how to get consistently good results with the standalone WMV player wit= hout knowing what the playback screen resolution is. We also noticed = that going to full screen mode sometimes made it look better. I downloaded a demo ver= sion of the Camtasia flash based screen recorder (http://www.techsmith.com/camtasia.= asp) and that seemed to work fine every time. One of the differe= nces is that they use an embedded player inside a web page. Perhaps u= sing an embedded WMV player would also work consistently, but my preference= is the standalone player. I prefer WMV because th= at is what I know best (and it is free). However, I may need to switc= h to Camtasia if I cannot get this figured out. Thanks for your suggest= ions. Mark From: Ingles, Dave [mailto: Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:55 AMTo: StreamingMe= dia.com - NewbiesSubject: RE: [newbies] Encoding for Screencams I'm not quite sure that I fully understand what y= ou are trying to say here, however any attempt to rescale the video fr= om its actual frame size will generally result in loss of perceptual qualit= y, especially if there is fine detail involved, as is usually the case with= screen capture. If you are playing the video back in the standalo= ne media player, then you may need to turn off the 'fit video to playe= r on resize' type option in the player and select the video size to 100% so= as it displays at its original size. If you are playing it in an embedded = player you could specify the size of the embedded player to match the video= size (plus the controls) so as it maintains the 1024x768 re= solution. The same issue applies with sync'd slide content,= as the quality of the slides will vary depending on if they are being scal= ed up or down from that of their actual size. Dave From: Mark O'Brien [mai= lto:] Sent: 31 October 2008 15:15To= : StreamingMedia.com - NewbiesSubject: [newbies] Encoding fo= r Screencams Jan Ozzer’s recent article in streaming media ma= gazine did an excellent job of addressing screen capture encoding. Ho= wever, I did not see the problem that I consistently run into addressed. I typically use WMV for screen captures, and they work= great as long as the playback machine has the same screen resolution. = ; However, if I change my screen resolution, or go to another machine with = a different screen resolution, the video looks horrible. Is there any way around this problem? Right now = I try to pick a “standard” resolution like 1024 x 768 before re= cording, but there is no way to know what resolution the end user is actual= ly using. Also, many people have wide screens now, which make screen = captures look even worse. I am looking for a way to make screen capture video lo= ok good at any playback screen resolution. The ideal solution would b= e playback video that maintains consistent quality, with only the viewing w= indow getting bigger or smaller depending on the viewer’s screen sett= ings. Is there a way to do that? Thanks, Mark ------------------To change your list settings or to be removed, send an e-ma= il - DO NOT e-mail the list asking to be removed. ------------------To change your list settings or to be removed, send an e-ma= il - DO NOT e-mail the list asking to be removed.------------------ To change your list settings or to be removed, send an e-mail help@streamin= gmedia.com - DO NOT e-mail the list asking to be removed. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C93B8E.9A61D619-- |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |

Search
Member List
Help

